This article is from page 24 of the 2011-10-11 edition of The Clare People. OCR mistakes are to be expected so download the original SWF or the rendered page 24 JPG
THE lack of capacity at wastewater treatment plants in the Ennis area has been cited by An Bord Pleanála as one of its reasons for refusing planning permission for a proposed 12-unit development in Barefield.
Martin Fitzgibbon (Builders) Ltd had applied for planning permission to develop 12 houses with garages, foul sewer pumping station with associated rising main connection to existing pumping station at Barefield School and ancillary site works, at Carrowdotia, Barefield.
Clare County Council refused permission earlier this year and the matter was appealed to An Bord Pleanála.
In upholding the decision of the Board’s inspector, the Board stated, “Having regard to the lack of capacity of the local authority wastewater treatment plant to adequately treat the wastewater from the proposed development in addition to the existing load on the plant, it is considered that the proposed development would be prejudicial to public health”.
The report adds, “Furthermore, the proposed development would set an undesirable precedent for and lead to demands for the upgrading and uneconomic provision of public services in the area and would be contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area”.
Clare County Council is currently awaiting a decision from An Board Pleanála regarding approval for a proposed upgrade of the Clonroadmore Wastewater Treatment Plant in Ennis.
The Board also ruled that the proposed Barefield development “would constitute an excessive density of suburban-type development in a rural area, which would militate against the preservation of the rural environment, would detract from the rural character of the area, would seriously injure the visual amenities of the area and would, therefore, be contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area”.
The Inspector’s site also cited the provisions of the Ennis and Environs Development Plan 2008-2014, which sets “out and overall strategic settlement strategy for the area”.
The report continues, “Notwithstanding the planning history of the site, and having regard to the nature and scale of the proposed development in a rural area, the provisions of the current development plan for the area, and the said Guidelines, it is considered that the proposed development would constitute a material contravention of the objective of the planning authority, would conflict with national guidelines, would militate against the future ordered development of the village of Barefield and would, therefore, be contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area”.