TWO Ennis businesses have failed in a bid to expand operations, as a result of planning decisions by Ennis Town Council and An Bord Pleanala.
Plans by Liam Cleary to redevelop his existing car sales site on the Kilrush Rd have been shot down by Ennis Town Council, while plans by Pat and Catherine Fitzpatrick to demolish their existing shop on the Tulla Rd and construct a new unit has been refused by An Bord Pleanala.
Mr Cleary sought to construct an underground car park, 13 retail units at ground floor level, 12 apartments and a cafe at first floor level, 12 apartments and a commercial unit at second floor level, and two penthouses at roof level.
However, the council ruled that the proposed development “would set an undesirable precedent for development within proposal sites.
“The proposal to locate residential accommodation over existing workshops would constitute haphazard development by virtue of noise and nuisance, would be injurious to the residential amenity of both existing houses and the proposed units, and taken in conjunction with the remainder of the proposed development would result in over-development of the site.
“By reason of its height, block form and layout, the absence of adequate private open space or public open space to serve the apartment units, it would seriously injure the amenity of existing and proposed residences.”
In response, Mr Cleary has appealed the decision to An Bord Pleanala, claiming that “our proposals would enhance this site which is underdeveloped and in such close proximity to Ennis Town Centre. Occupants of this development could walk in five minutes to the town centre without having to drive and to clog up the existing town”.
The council refused planning permission for the Fitzpatrick development, prompting the applicants to appeal to An Bord Pleanala. The Inspector had ruled in favour of the development, but the appeals board disregarded that recommendation and refused permission on two grounds.
The board ruled that it would constitute over-development of the site and seriously injure the amenities of the area. The Board also ruled that a shortfall in parking provision would result in overspill roadside parking which would endanger public safety by reason of traffic hazard.